Removal of unlawful HMO restriction condition in West Ealing

Planning Permission Granted (Condition Removed)

Address:

40 Rosebank Road,
London
W7 2EN

Council:
London Borough of Ealing

Removal of planning condition restricting the use of new flats as HMOs

In this case, our client had obtained planning permission to convert a house in Ealing into two self-contained flats. The permission was granted, but the council imposed a condition stating that the new flats could not be used as small houses in multiple occupation (HMOs).

A small HMO (use class C4) accommodates between three and six unrelated occupiers. Under the General Permitted Development Order, houses and flats can normally change to C4 use without planning permission. The condition therefore removed a permitted development right which Parliament has granted nationally.

A cartoon explaining how a HMO is defined in planning

If a council wishes to remove permitted development rights more generally, it should do so by way of an Article 4 direction, supported by proper evidence and justification. Conditions must meet the six tests set out in national policy. They must be necessary, reasonable, relevant to planning and justified by the specific circumstances of the site.

In this case, there was no site-specific reason to remove the right. The officer’s report did not identify any particular harm that would arise from a C4 use, nor did it explain why this property should be treated differently from any other dwelling in the borough. The condition appeared to reflect a general concern about HMOs rather than a planning harm arising from this development.

We also pointed out the fallback position. As a detached house, the property could already have been used as a six-person HMO under permitted development without any application at all. Once converted into two flats, the practical intensity of occupation would not exceed what was already possible. There was therefore no clear planning justification for restricting Class L rights in this instance.

We applied to remove the condition and argued that it failed the national policy tests. The council agreed and the restriction was lifted.

This case is a reminder that councils cannot use conditions simply to reinforce a general policy preference. Where permitted development rights are removed without proper justification, that decision can be challenged.

If you are dealing with HMO restrictions, planning conditions or enforcement issues in Ealing, you may also wish to read our guidance on:

If you have had permitted development rights removed by condition, or are facing planning difficulties relating to HMOs, contact us for advice.

For a full guide to the planning rules for HMOs, including Article 4 directions and planning appeals, visit our Planning Permission for HMOs page.

I simply cannot emphasise enough how experienced, communicate and friendly Martin is.
Not only did he succeed in helping us through quite a major problem, but he also did it with class.

Going to a planner is one thing, but to have someone like Martin on your ‘power team’ is invaluable. Massive thanks Martin and I will be using you again.

Moshe Baron

Need some advice on your planning or enforcement appeal?

Send us the decision or enforcement notice and we will review it, explain your chances of success and set out the next steps.

Prefer to read up first?

Martin Gaine’s book ‘How to Get Planning Permission – An Insider’s Secrets’ tells you everything you need to know about how the system really works.

Need planning advice?

Get a free expert assessment.

Fill in the form below to receive our assessment on your chances of success. You will also receive a personalised fixed-fee quote for the preparation, submission and management of your appeal.

If you prefer to email, we can be reached at info@just-planning.co.uk.