This appeal related to a refusal of prior approval for a larger home extension at a semi-detached property in Redbridge. The proposal involved the demolition of an existing single-storey rear addition and the construction of a new single-storey rear extension with a depth of six metres.
The council refused prior approval on the basis that the extension would harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular concern raised in relation to number 322 Cranbrook Road, citing potential impacts on daylight, sunlight and outlook.
The inspector noted that the proposal complied with the relevant limitations set out in Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO, including the maximum depth and height restrictions. The appeal therefore turned solely on the assessment of amenity impacts under the prior approval regime.
In considering the effect on neighbouring properties, the inspector found that, due to the relative orientation of the dwellings, the proposed extension would not result in overshadowing or loss of light. Although the extension would project further than the existing rear addition, the inspector placed weight on the generous rear garden lengths and the open aspect to the rear, concluding that the increased sense of enclosure would not be perceived as excessively overbearing.
The inspector also noted that neighbouring properties in the immediate vicinity had already been extended to a similar depth, and that the proposal would not result in adverse impacts on privacy or outlook to adjoining occupiers.
On that basis, the inspector concluded that the development would not cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring residents and allowed the appeal, granting prior approval for the extension.
If you are considering planning appeals in Redbridge, this decision provides a useful illustration of how inspectors approach refusals of prior approval for larger home extensions.
For comparison, you may also find it helpful to read about a successful Redbridge application for prior approval for a larger home extension, where permission was granted on resubmission rather than at appeal.
